|
Author
|
Topic: Who changed Ceylon to S(*($*$(*)(?
|
|
Henry
|
posted January 23, 2001 10:44 AM
-[This message has been edited by Henry (edited October 17, 2001).] |
|
Casper
|
posted January 29, 2001 05:44 PM
yes...somethings never change....Idiots like you will always remain idiots  |
|
- Henry
|
posted February 06, 2001 11:00 AM
And some of us will never comprehend the historical consequences- which is my point here. All that is necessary is a catalyst; in this case, nationalism is what was instigated. |
|
Casper
|
posted February 06, 2001 12:14 PM
For thousands of years our Island was called "Siri Laka" "Heladiva" and only for a short period (i.e from mid 1800's to early 1970's) was it referred to by the name Ceylon that was given to it by the British, who essentially invaded and ruled this island. Hence, it is appropriate to go back to its original name. Japan calls itself from its original name Nippon. Madras changed its name to its original name. (Chennai) Bombay changed its name to its original name.(Mumbai) The name Ceylon was changed to Sri Lanka because it is its rightful name.
[This message has been edited by Casper (edited February 06, 2001).] |
|
Maha
|
posted February 06, 2001 08:17 PM
A point to ponder..."Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?" - Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) |
|
Derek
|
posted February 08, 2001 08:59 PM
Come on guys, lets get one thing straight - Sri Lanka will never be "Ceylon" again. It's about time we shake away any such remaining colonial hangovers. For example, the other day I met someone who called "Sri Lankan Airlines", "Air Ceylon" - what a joker, living in the past. |
|
- Henry
|
posted February 09, 2001 10:29 AM
S)$* L(&)%*A is a purely Sinhalese name. The great racist S. Bandaranaike came up with it at the height of her racist powers. It is simply part of the catastrophic cycle of Sinhala-Buddhist nationalism which came about during the earlier stages. [This message has been edited by - Henry (edited February 09, 2001).] |
|
Casper
|
posted February 09, 2001 11:32 AM
Henry, you seem to have missed the point. Our Island was knows as Heladiva, Siri Laka, Lankawa etc for thousands of years. That is why we gave up using the name given to us by the British and went back to its original name. So you feel anger because as you put it, Sri Lanka is a "purely Sinhala name".....but have you ever realized that Ceylon is a "purely english name" ? Why should this Island be known by a name which is "foreign" to it ? Britain will never call it self by a Sinhala name and likewise our island should never call itself by a "British/English" name.Have you ever wondered why this Island has been called by a "purely Sinhala name" for thousands of years, instead of a "purely English" name ??? One can not change facts. [This message has been edited by Casper (edited February 09, 2001).] [This message has been edited by Casper (edited February 09, 2001).] |
|
Ranjan_Reborn
|
posted February 09, 2001 03:29 PM
Open Plea to Destroy the Sinhala Race(an EPIDOMIC) from the Face of the Earth for Humanity SAFETY! |
|
Derek
|
posted February 11, 2001 08:04 PM
try again ranjan. |
|
- Henry
|
posted February 13, 2001 10:30 AM
"Our" island- nice try. It is a well-established fact that before colonialism, there were two seperate nations. At no time did the two ethnic groups interact within the bounds of the same political sphere. This is one of the basic arguments of the LTTE; in terms of this perspective, they are not creating a new nation; but simply resurrecting an old one. |
|
Casper
|
posted February 13, 2001 10:33 AM
Henry, Nice try ! Sri Lanka has always been one country before the European invasions, and after. Sri Lanka will also always remain One Country. |
|
Janz
|
posted February 13, 2001 03:26 PM
Yes, if the myth that "there were two seperate nations" before the Colonials came is one of the basic arguments of LTTE (as Henry claims) - I guess the LTTE doesn't have a case now does it? |
|
Ranjan_Reborn
|
posted February 13, 2001 03:42 PM
JANZ,Your Son Need you...He is going to end up DUMB like you, stop wasting your time at info lanka, spent time on him, otherwise, he would end up like Child Molesters, Killers, Rapists like your fellow Sinhala Brothers |
|
thadhasinhalaya
|
posted February 13, 2001 04:38 PM
retard - buy yourself a thesaurus and learn some new words - ytour standard whines are getting very droll. |
|
- Henry
|
posted February 14, 2001 10:32 AM
People live in the "same country" a thousand years and can't even speak the other guy's language; are 100% religiously homogeneous (in terms of Buddhism and Hinduism); this is the context of my argument. Give it up! It's too obvious; do we need to debate it? |
|
Casper
|
posted February 14, 2001 11:08 AM
Henry, The inability of the two communities to speak eacth others language may have contributed in some way for towards the present day crisis. That has been recognized and that is why now all school children (at least in the government funded schools) have to take Tamil or Sinhala as a third language. I sponsor 7 children in SL (from very rural areas) and they send me their report cards and all of them take Tamil as a third language. While you complain the Sri lankan people don't speak the two main official languages, have you made any attempt to learn the "other" language ? I have to admit that I have failed to learn Tamil and I wish I learnt it. [This message has been edited by Casper (edited February 14, 2001).] |
|
Observer
|
posted February 14, 2001 01:20 PM
What kind of BS is this -Henry taking about? Thousands of years??? Thousands of years ago Tamil kings came to SL to invade the land just like the Portuguese, Dutch and English did much later (that is a whole separate issue altogether). Bottom line is Tamil kings were defeated and land was freed from foreign powers. Few Tamils who were left in Sri Lanka, some moved to Jaffna (Northern part) and some mixed in to the community. Obviously they leaned Sinhala (I Hope Henry is not expecting all the Canadians to learn Tamil after he moved to Canada). The rest of the Tamils were brought in by other invaders (mainly English), which came in much later. I have to mention lot of illegal Tamil immigrant also cam in during this era. Well that is that. Now Sri Lanka is being more than generous to encourage students to learn Sinhala and Tamil while English being the international language. Only 23% Tamils…. You do the math. Nevertheless, speaking three languages is an excellent idea we should encourage all to learn for the future of our country! Having said that, I must say these LTTE supporters are ever so eager to change history. To make up history which never existed. -Henry is contradicting his own "cause" by bringing subject. Better ask your grand parents for validity before typing again. BTW, I don't want to hear any retarded (pun intended) comments about this.
|
|
nagarjuna
|
posted February 21, 2001 05:56 AM
just bringing this to the top
|
|
SpeedyGonzalez
|
posted March 14, 2001 07:02 PM
For thousands of years, Sri Lanka was also called EelamSo, why wasn't the name changed from Ceylon to Eelam if as Casper says the only reason they wanted to change the name was get rid of colonialist attitudes. What is this nonsense about Sri Lanka being a unified Sinhalese nation before the Portuguese? There were three distinct kingdoms. When the Jaffna kingdom fell to foreign power, the Kandy kingdom itself lamented the fact that it had lost a close ally of its! Observer: Check your facts again! Most of the people who came to the island were Tamils or of South-Indian origin. This has been documented by Sinhala authors even and I have even posted a quote from Obeyeskere's work elsewhere in this forum! Heck, even your great Anagarika Dharmapala is from a caste that traces its origins to South India! Finally, I don't think Henry expects Canadians to learn Tamil although Canada, being a true democracy, expects its citizens to learn both French and English. Maybe Sri Lanka can learn something from Canada. |
|
Casper
|
posted March 15, 2001 12:26 PM
What do you mean Canada expects its citizens to learn both languages? There are thousands of Canadians who don't understand a word of French. On the other hand, many of the French do understand English. There is no law in Canada which states that all citizens should speak both languages. Well ofcourse, it is better if one speaks all the languages of the land ! I admire Canada's attempt in maintaing the French and English official language status in all the Government offices. That is one thing Sri Lanka should learn from Canada. All the public officials who deal with the public speak both languages. Sri Lanka should be like that too. All public servants should be taught both languages.
[This message has been edited by Casper (edited March 15, 2001).] |
|
EelamRanjan
|
posted March 15, 2001 02:49 PM
The inability of the two communities to speak eacth others language may have contributed in some way for towards the present day crisisAND, So, why wasn't the name changed from Ceylon to Eelam if as Casper says the only reason they wanted to change the name was get rid of colonialist attitudes What can I say, CASPER always manage to find EXCUSES for all the Oppressive Things her Sinhala Governments and Her people have done to Tamils, What can I say, she is getting better at this as the days progress. CANADA, is envy to the world. For people from just ONE PROVINCE, Canada maintains Both Official Language Policy in the other Nine Provinces and Two Territories. What a Democracy. Not only that, Every software they use, every documents they print, employees and the Government Departments will be punished if they don't make them bi-lingual 100% of the time(not even 95%), even though there hardly french people live outside of Quebec, they MUST make sure the French Forms are available at anytime across the country. AND IF YOU WANT TO WORK IN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, YOU HAVE TO KNOW BOTH OFFICIAL LANGUAGES FLUENTLY. And they all know here the French are the one Most Benifits from this Policy because, almost every French speak English and only few English Speak French. Therefore, It is harder for an English Speaking Canadian to get a Job in Federal Government. BUT, Canadian Government had to do this in order to KEEP the country together. Lets Imagine, if this situation arise in Sri Lanka, they will bring new Standadization Law(like they did for University Studies) to CRUSH the monority rights. REALITY CHECK AND the Canadian Government has given SELF-DETERMINATION to french Speaking QUEBEC Province. QUEBEC HAS ITS OWN IMMIGRATION POLICY and More powers than the rest of thr 11 Canadian Provinces, LETS FACE IT. This is the way to keep the minorities happy MAKE THEM FEEL part of the GREATER SOCIETY instead of CRUSHING their rights as the Sri Lankan Goverment and CASPER's people do, everyday And, the majority of FORMER and Even the Present Canadian Prime Ministers are a FRENCH CANADIANS FROM THE PROVINCE OF QUEBEC? UNLIKE the Sinhala, the civilized Canadian English people don't have any problem with that. Casper, CAN A Tamil FROM JAFFNA ever become an Elected President of Sri Lanka? We all know what happened to Mr. Vasantharaja, Former Rupavahini Chairman, who tried to do something against Sinhala Wish, THIS IS WHY WE TAMILS NEED A SEPERATE COUNTRY CASPER, FREE FROM YOUR SYSTEMATIC OPPRESSIONS.
[This message has been edited by EelamRanjan (edited March 16, 2001).] |
|
SpeedyGonzalez
|
posted March 16, 2001 04:22 AM
Casper: You haven't understood my comments properly. I said the government expects its people to be bilingual but it doesn't enforce it on them. It makes every provision available to all Canadians so that they can become bilingual if they so desire.This is the difference between the Canadian and Sri Lankan governments. The Sri Lankan government makes no such honest or sustained effort to make available resources to all its citizens to make them truly bi- or tri-lingual. |
|
EelamRanjan
|
posted March 16, 2001 09:20 AM
I Agree, Casper is out of her mind!! |
|
Casper
|
posted March 16, 2001 09:32 AM
Speedy, I agree with you that the government is probably not making enough of an attempt to teach public servants all official languages. FYI Sri lankan government is trying to teach both languages atleast to the next generation. Now Tamil or Sinhala is taught in every government school as a third language for student in Sinhala and Tamil medium, respectively. ElamRanjan, Yes, canada is very good in keeping their official language policies. Ther is a lot we can learn from Canada. You are wrong when you say "you have to be fluent in BOTH official languages to work for the federal government". My best friend works at Revenue Canada, a federal agency and she speaks and writes only English. It is only the people who directly deal with the public that are expected to be fluent in BOTH languages. It is not required of computer programmers, accountants, engineers etc etc who will not come in contact with the public on a daily basis. [This message has been edited by Casper (edited March 16, 2001).] |
|
NORWAY
|
posted March 16, 2001 09:39 AM
I agree 200% Ranjan's Comments! I think Casper IS LOOSING HER MIND! |
|
EelamRanjan
|
posted March 16, 2001 09:51 AM
Hi Casper,I am a Computer Programmer myself, and I worked for Health Canada last hear and now I am with the Bell. In two days, I am going back to work with the Federal Government Again. And I am not fluent in French. If you want to be a FULL time employees of the Government, you MUST be bilingual, no other way. For temporary(they call it TERM employees, usually not hired directly by the Government but thru a Emp Agency) or Contrators like myself, can work with them for short time without knowing french. But for Permanent, a big NO NO. Not only the front line employees(This is why the English are upset here), everone must know French. I know a Tamil(from India) Big Manager at Health Canada. He had been manage to be working permanent for the past 20 yrs. Last year they told him he must learn French or he would be out of his job. So, last year they sent him to French Class with pay and at the end he had to proof his French by writing an Exam, but he failed. Now they gave him a month extention to proof his knowledge or He will be out of JOB. And other thing, We created a Database for Health Canada last year, every single English Word we write, we had to also write the French Translation besides. If you go to any Canadian Government Website, you can see this proof. When we went alive with the database, it was required by law, to have the documentation READY in both official Languages. BUT Casper, they have a Provision for Visual Minorities(Excluding English Natives) like US Tamils and your Friend, that JUST to increase the Visual Minority Representation in the Federal Government, they do hire sometimes the Colored People even though THEY DON'T SPEAK FRENCH [This message has been edited by EelamRanjan (edited March 16, 2001).] |
|
NORWAY
|
posted March 16, 2001 10:11 AM
Ranjan,You are simply amazing me man with your interllect qualities. You have what it take to be the Future King of Tamil Eelam. |
|
- Henry
|
posted March 16, 2001 10:32 AM
Casper: How many public officials would be interested in learning both languages? Besides, what's the use when 99.9% of the civil service is Sinhalese and government transactions are conducted in Sinhalese? |
|
EelamRanjan
|
posted March 16, 2001 11:19 AM
Thanks NORWAY. |
|
Casper
|
posted March 16, 2001 11:32 AM
Ranjan, My friend who works for Revenue Canada is not what one would call a visual minority. Henry, 99.9% of the government transactions are not conducted in Sinhala. The Government Gazette, for axample is printed in both languages and has been do for the past 15 years or more. I am not saying SL is yet 100% bilingual. But we are getting there. Canada became bilingual only in the early 80's or so. We are not Canada and we do not have their resources. Public opinion and government policy in SL is changing for the better, i.e: making a bilingual state. it is my sincere hope that SL will be a truly bilingual country , soon.
[This message has been edited by Casper (edited March 16, 2001).] |
|
byzant
|
posted March 16, 2001 05:59 PM
One thing is for certain. The slaughter of the innocents, the deep suffering that the common man has to bear when war rages around him and his family as he tries to plant, tend and harvest, the financial loss to the nation and its people and the general destruction of infrastructure is is'nt making any of these just and righteous changes in Sri Lankan society more likely to become a reality.You must know the story of the bet between the sun and the wind, where the wind bets the sun that he can get the a man to take off his coat. He blows and howls around the man but the man only pulls his coat tighter around himself and the wind fails to blow it off. The sun just shines on the man and within a few he is tearing it off. Moral? Persuasion always easier(OK nicer than) than force. You say these bombs and other killing of villages full of people are to bring the country around to your way of thinking and get the attention of the world. You have our attention! No need to do it again. We are listening. Now act Tigers, before you become extinct. I know you dont like it but the fact is you Tigers must do as I say. Lay arms down,demolish defensive constructions, mark minefields (extremely important), de-mobilise the LTTE and send the children home. Thwe SLA will cease all military action and make no advances nor occupy LTTE held territory, anyone without war crime problems could remain and await the arrival of international police force which would care for and protect Tamil interests and lives against retaliatory crimes. To be replaced as and when agreed among all combatants by a newly trained National Police. Maybe like the RCMP or the FBI. Having authority over any local force and being racially relative to the area and to the island as a whole. It would be so very very good. You may as well get used to the idea and save time and lives by encouraging it to happen sooner rather than later.
|
|
Website
|
posted March 16, 2001 08:52 PM
Bilingual is essential for a multicultural country like Sri Lanka. I've been to Sri Lanka and I do not think that the Tamil lnaguage is suppressed in anyway. The process of converting everything into three languages (English included) can be time consuming but its getting there. All official documents come in Sinhala, Tamil and English, including forms.I don't think English will ever be the link langauge is Sri Lanka because only very few pwople speak it - perhaps when everyone learns english. Tamils living in Wellawatte and Dehiwala are extremely fluent in Sinhala (I'm speaking out of personal experience) and Sinhala has become the link language in Colombo because it is easy to pick up and most people speak it.
|
|
- Henry
|
posted March 19, 2001 02:47 PM
Website: Your comments could not better portray the intentions of the SL government: to destroy the Tamil national character. I shall put it briefly: this war is shallow, essentially a fraud. The only reason the SL government bothers with so-called civil-rights legislation is to recieve funds from the IC so it can keep fighting. Its well-known what will happen should the SL government win the war on its side: full-fledged colonisation, even more involvement of the monks in government and economic policy, and other designs to promote the Buddhist cause. By spreading Sinhala settlement to all four corners of the island, the government can successfully erode Tamil culture and create a mythical Buddhist theocracy. Thats what its really interested in- not Captalism or the well-being of citizens, but the spread of Buddhism- enough to justify the cause of the LTTE. |
|
SpeedyGonzalez
|
posted March 20, 2001 01:37 PM
Exactly Henry!!Website's comments shows that he even salivates at the prospects of Tamils learning Sinhala and in the process the Tamil community become Sinhalized just as the Burgher community has and the present Muslim community is undergoing. According to such mentality, another ethnic group cannot maintain its distinct origins and attributes. Language is one of the important things that defines an ethnic community! To lose it, is to lose one's ethnicity. And whats this nonsense about Sinhala being more easier to pick up than Tamil? Childish arguments. Here's a thought website: To be bi-lingual in Sri Lanka doesn't mean that only Tamils should learn Sinhala. The reverse must be true also. Sinhalese should learn Tamil also. I mean, if Sinhala is easy to pick up, why isn't Tamil? I think English should be made the only official language because studying in the vernacular only succeeds in polarizing the communities and creating mistrust in an atmosphere of ignorance. [This message has been edited by SpeedyGonzalez (edited March 20, 2001).] |
|
- Henry
|
posted May 26, 2001 09:33 PM
Along with English-only schools, this conflict would never have began in the first place. | |