Ex Sri lankan
God Member
   

"No legacy is so rich as honesty.”
Posts: 2734
Gender:
|
NMAT calls on government to launch decisive military action against the LTTE Terrorist COLOMBO, SinhalaNet 2006.07.25 03:48PM] The National Movement Against Terrorism (NMAT) calls on government to launch decisive military action against the LTTE instead of operating in a reactive, ad hoc and irresponsible manner. These were elucidated at a media briefing held at National library and documentation services board auditorium, Colombo -07, this morning. NMAT Leaders, including National Organizer Palitha Wicremarathne, NMAT Spokesmen, Lecturer Anuruddha Pradeep, and NMAT International Secretary Malinda Senevirathne were participated to the Press conference. NMAT leaders also stated that the cease fire agreement has no meaning any more and that it is only a document abused and violated with impunity by the LTTE. NMAT Leaders, including National Organizer Palitha Wicremarathne, NMAT Spokesmen, Lecturer Anuruddha Pradeep, and NMAT International Secretary Malinda Senevirathne were participated to the Press conference The full statement of the NMAT is as follows: “ If the question is 'What of conflict, what of peace?', then a legitimate answer, we believe, would be, 'the Government operates as though the CFA has meaning, the LTTE as though it never existed'. The CFA, or Ceasefire Agreement, does not and cannot lapse based on what is happening on the ground. It ceases to exist only if one of the parties to it releases an official statement of withdrawal. What has happened and what is happening is simply that the LTTE continues to milk the CFA for its benefits even as it fights. Civil life, rule of law, normalcy, peace and other things that the CFA was supposed to yield, meanwhile, bleed to death slowly. There can be no 'ceasefire' when one party violates it over 6000 times, murders ministers, launches suicide attacks, massacres unarmed and innocent civilians in their hundreds. 'War' is the best descriptive; 'peace' a noble aspiration but a misnomer and unemployable term with respect to the current status of the conflict. We firmly believe that it is incumbent on the Government, the international community, political parties and groups and everyone else concerned to recognize this state of affairs and resolve not to indulge in fantasies and day-dreaming. The first respondent to this situation is naturally the Government. This Government came to power promising peace with dignity or an honourable peace. What was meant by 'honourable peace' can easily be obtained when one peruses the rhetoric of the candidates and the forces arrayed on either side. It was abundantly clear at the time that the LTTE was not interested in peace, was violating the CFA with impunity and with scandalous regularity and increasing audacity. At the time, the then President as well as Ranil Wickremesinghe (one of the signatories to the CFA) had taken a position of ignoring these violations to the point of openly encouraging the same. Mahinda Rajapaksa won the Presidential Election on the platform that this would be arrested and that terrorism will not be encouraged or given breathing space. The people elected him to wipe out the terrorist threat. They did not elect him to mollycoddle Prabhakaran. Today, he has to deliver. Today, one party fights, the other gropes about in the dark. This is an extremely dangerous situation for the country, the people and even for this government. The LTTE is gathering strength. The regularity of atrocities, we must understand, has the effect of becoming so common as to lull the international community to brush off such acts as 'more of the usual'. As for the Government, it is fast losing its popular base. Mahinda Rajapaksa stands tall only because he is standing on anti-Tiger public sentiment. His political stability depends on the extent to which he demonstrates strength, farsightedness and tenacity in the face of terrorism. The people did not want another Chandrika Kumaratunga or Ranil Wickremesinghe. Even today they seek the Mahinda Rajapaksa they saw during the election campaign and not someone who slips in the face of terrorism. They are seeking a Mahinda Rajapaksa who would lead the nation against the terrorist with determination. Unfortunately, as anyone would point out, the President and his Government have clearly chosen the path of defeat. There is nothing to be won by playing the waiting game. Much has been lost and much is being lost even as we speak. Sri Lanka will not get one extra iota of support from the international community. No one will take up arms to fight our fight against terrorism. As for the LTTE, it will not be stopped by actions such as the EU ban. The Government has to understand that international support has reached a ceiling. While it is possible that there could be some censure from the international community, there is nothing to say that even such negatives cannot be managed. In any event slumber and day-dreaming is not the answer. The National Movement Against Terrorism urges the Government to stop being coy about the threat to national security and civilian life and take on the LTTE in a systematic and comprehensive manner or else embark on a strategy of targetted engagement. The National Movement Against Terrorism consider the worst possible defeat would be the fall of Jaffna to the hands of the terrorists and that the worst defeat that the LTTE can suffer would be the loss of the Eastern Province. The latter is the more likely, but the former is by no means inconceivable. The political moment does not spell tragedy. The new leadership of the security forces, a new president with a fresh mandate, if coupled with strategy, determination and the securing of public support, would prove decisive in any engagement with terrorism. It is incumbent on the Government to strike and strike decisively at the proper moment. The National Movement Against Terrorism strongly urges the Government to do so. The second option is to match the LTTE for strategy; i.e. target and eliminate the high command of the LTTE while destroying through other means their infrastructure. Whatever option is chosen by the Government, it is very important that the loopholes in the law be shut down forthwith. The law, as it stands, and as subordinate to the dictates of the CFA, is hardly sufficient to deal with terrorism. The relevant acts should be strengthened and the fight be taken to the LTTE on all its fronts using emergency regulations. Where the existing laws do not constitute sufficient safeguards and do not empower the relevant agencies to effectively take on terrorism, other and necessary legislative enactments should be formulated and ratified in parliament. NMAT Leaders, including National Organizer Palitha Wicremarathne, NMAT Spokesmen, Lecturer Anuruddha Pradeep, and NMAT International Secretary Malinda Senevirathne were participated to the Press conference What of the international community? India cannot be ignored. India has said that her support is only for a negotiated settlement. If the Government and the LTTE are both agreeable to negotiations then India's support is not necessary. The support of an actor such as India is useful only if one of the parties is not interested in peace. Everyone knows who is against peace. We have one question for India: 'Are you ready to employ whatever means at your disposal to bring the LTTE to the negotiating table?' If the answer is 'no', then the various statements issued by India have no relevance or political meaning. The reality, one has to conclude, is that India may very well look the other way in the hour of need of its friendly neighbour. As mentioned earlier, the EU and other countries have shown what the maximum support they are willing to offer is. No country in the world will step in to settle this problem. The long and short of it is that all matters are now in our own hands. The unnecessary internationalization of the issue thanks to the CFA has to be turned around and brought within our spheres of control. Unfortunately both the Government and the Opposition seem to be doing just the opposite. Finally we can conclude (generously) that the CFA was a well-intentioned experiment that went wrong. It has brought us to the brink of tragedy. This has been proven beyond a shadow of doubt. Now it is high time to find a way out of the mess. “
|